{"id":58,"date":"2015-02-26T16:51:10","date_gmt":"2015-02-27T00:51:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/faculty.lmu.edu\/mollyyoungkin\/?page_id=58"},"modified":"2015-03-10T15:42:33","modified_gmt":"2015-03-10T22:42:33","slug":"annotation-wit-and-mystery-a-revaluation-in-mediaeval-latin-hymnody","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/faculty.lmu.edu\/mollyyoungkin\/walter-ong-bibliography\/articles-1940-1949\/annotation-wit-and-mystery-a-revaluation-in-mediaeval-latin-hymnody\/","title":{"rendered":"Annotation: Wit and Mystery: A Revaluation in Mediaeval Latin Hymnody"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In this article, Ong divides his thoughts on the genre into six sections.\u00a0 In section one, he introduces his subject by making the point that critics tend to underemphasize the importance of Latin literature in the Middle Ages and pay more attention to vernacular works:\u00a0 this is especially true for Latin hymnody, in which the <i>Dies Irae<\/i> and the <i>Stabat Mater Dolorosa<\/i> are the only frequently cited works and the more metaphysical works of Adam of St. Victor and St. Thomas Aquinas are almost completely ignored.\u00a0 Because of this oversight, Ong\u2019s aim in the article is to explore the works of these two men, particularly how they both used wit as a poetic device to illustrate the mysteries of Christianity (a more serious use of wit than simple word play).<\/p>\n<p>In the second and third sections of the article, Ong provides examples of the two men\u2019s works which display this tendency to use wit in a more serious manner, and he asserts that this use of wit creates a rather complex approach to Christian theology.\u00a0 In the fourth section of the article, Ong elaborates on the complexity of this theology by comparing the work of these two men to the <i>Dies Irae<\/i> and the <i>Sabat Mater Dolorosa<\/i>, the two examples of Latin hymnody most frequently cited by critics.\u00a0 These two works, Ong asserts, can be characterized as coming out of the Franciscan school, in which the Christian mysteries are illustrated in a more simple manner than they are in the work of Adam of St. Victor and Aquinas.\u00a0 Ong even claims that the Franciscan school simplifies the complex nature of the Adamic-Thomistic theology by presenting a poem by Jacopone da Todi that imitates a passage by Aquinas:\u00a0 clearly, Ong prefers the work of Adam and Aquina to that of the Franciscans.<\/p>\n<p>In the fifth section of the article, Ong returns to the work of the two men and shows how, in their writings, the poetic device wit is a &#8220;normal means&#8221; for discussing the Christian mysteries.\u00a0 Aquinas believed that while poetry and theology are not the same, for poetry lacks the truth while theology embodies it, he thought that both poetry and theology called for the use of analogies or metaphors (which are found in wit through word-play), precisely because poetry\u2019s lack of truth means it can never speak of the truth directly and the overwhelming nature of the truth in theology makes direct speaking of the truth impossible.\u00a0 At this point in the article, Ong applies his now fully developed discussion of the process of human knowledge (taking material examples and converting them to abstract ideas) to Aquinas\u2019 ideas about the differences and similarities between poetry and theology.\u00a0 While poetry defies abstraction and theology, especially Christian theology with the concepts of the Trinity and the Incarnation, encourages abstraction, both poetry and theology demand more of the human intellect than it is capable of performing, a weakness Ong believes Aquinas identified with because he often practiced the process of gaining knowledge through the material-to-abstract transformation.\u00a0 But Ong also points out that while Aquinas recognized the &#8220;unsatisfying&#8221; nature of religious belief (when compared to the more satisfying experience of the intellectual process), he thought that belief was an important part of the thinking process, something that must be relied upon by all humans at certain moments.<\/p>\n<p>At the end of the fifth section of the article, Ong comes back to the idea of the connection between poetry and theory in the &#8220;wit poetry&#8221; of Latin hymnody, and in the sixth section of the article, concludes that although the genre did not have the close contact with the material world vernacular literature had, Latin hymnody\u2019s access to vast amounts of metaphors and analogies made it no more limited a mode of expression than vernacular literature.<\/p>\n<div align=\"right\"><a href=\"http:\/\/faculty.lmu.edu\/mollyyoungkin\/walter-ong-bibliography\/articles-1940-1949#witand\">Return to Listings<\/a><\/div>\n<hr width=\"100%\" \/>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In this article, Ong divides his thoughts on the genre into six sections.\u00a0 In section one, he introduces his subject by making the point that critics tend to underemphasize the importance of Latin literature in the Middle Ages and pay more attention to vernacular works:\u00a0 this is especially true for Latin hymnody, in which the &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/faculty.lmu.edu\/mollyyoungkin\/walter-ong-bibliography\/articles-1940-1949\/annotation-wit-and-mystery-a-revaluation-in-mediaeval-latin-hymnody\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Annotation: Wit and Mystery: A Revaluation in Mediaeval Latin Hymnody<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":0,"parent":37,"menu_order":18,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"class_list":["post-58","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/faculty.lmu.edu\/mollyyoungkin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/58","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/faculty.lmu.edu\/mollyyoungkin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/faculty.lmu.edu\/mollyyoungkin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/faculty.lmu.edu\/mollyyoungkin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/faculty.lmu.edu\/mollyyoungkin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/faculty.lmu.edu\/mollyyoungkin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/58\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/faculty.lmu.edu\/mollyyoungkin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/37"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/faculty.lmu.edu\/mollyyoungkin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}